Subscribe to RSSTHe Week
Construction for nat'l games to finish in 4 days
Do not entertain illegal Tibetans, says Chinese expert on Tibetology
SRC report to be first discussed in thematic committee
Gupta repeats Madhes may break ties with Kathmandu
SC stays Gachchhadar's citizenship fiat
Govt to bust brokers at Kalimati veg market
Govt, Maoists to be blamed if country blacklisted: UML
My Republica e-Paper.
Phalano by Rajesh KC
Cartoon Archive »  

  Daily News
  Photo Gallery
  Loadshedding Schedule
  Govt Policies & Programs
  Budget 2009/10 Speech

Low o
High o
Sunrise N/A
Sunset N/A
  Pure hogwash  


Desperate to give a positive message to public that the government is doing the needful to spur growth and job creation, the concerned authorities are echoing a familiar line these days: The economy is back on track and investment climate is getting better. The officials at the prime minister’s office, the central bank and the finance ministry argue that growth will be 5 percent this fiscal year and the economy will see a surge in investment. Furthermore, they are asserting that the improvement in select macroeconomic indicators will entice foreign investment and spur jobs creation.

Nonsense. The fact is that the economy is still stuck in the same-old quagmire of low growth, low job opportunities, fledging industrial sector, high prices, low savings, high imports and consumption, and remittances-fueled impact-less investment cycles. The said rosy outlook is due to favorable exogenous factors. There is hardly any real policy change to induce structural transformation required to put the economy on a high growth path. All we have got is hastily designed grand plans and hollow promises to implement them.

The main source for the claim of 5 percent economic growth, which is unlikely, comes from the estimation by Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (MoAC) that there will be bumper agriculture production, especially record paddy harvest. Agriculture sector constitutes about 33 percent of GDP and engages 83 percent of the population. Paddy is a major part of daily food consumption and contributes 21 percent to agricultural GDP. The officials have estimated that a 13.7 percent increase in paddy production will be enough to satisfy domestic demand, export surplus, and push up economic growth to 5 percent.

Now, looking at the cheerful faces of ministers and policymakers, one wonders about their contribution in all this. Well, it is not because of any substantial policy change that agriculture production has increased; it is due to timely monsoon. The Bhattarai-led government cannot claim credit for this. A blip in agriculture production this year like it happened in 2007/08—when agriculture sector grew by 5.8 percent, leading to GDP growth of 6.1 percent—and its impact on growth does not mean that our economy is set on a track of high growth.

Furthermore, the main source for the claim of a favorable macroeconomic situation is a recently released macroeconomic update of the first five months of this fiscal year, which was misconstrued by leaders who are eager to show that economic indicators are sound during their tenure. The central bank’s figures reveal a huge balance of payments (BoP) surplus—an accounting record of all monetary transaction made between Nepal and all other countries—which reached Rs 61.19 billion. Similarly, current account—which is the aggregate of balance of trade (exports minus imports of both merchandise goods and services), net factor income (such as interests and dividends), and net transfer payments (such as remittances, foreign aid and pensions)—registered a surplus of Rs 24.89 billion. Another noticeable improvement was in foreign exchange reserves, which reached US$ 4.31 billion and is enough to finance imports for up to 9.3 months.
There is no revolution. The good news about bumper agriculture production, improved reserves and BoP surplus is more accidental than policy-driven.

This definitely sends a good message about the state of our macroeconomy to absorb external shocks and repayment ability. Again, it was achieved not because of any sudden miraculous change in policies, but because of external factors. The increase in BoP surplus has to do more with massive increase in remittance inflows and improved services sector earnings.

Remittance inflows increased by 37.9 percent between the first five months of this and last fiscal years. Transfers increased by 29.5 percent, including substantial excise refund by India. Services sector earnings increased by 46.4 percent. Some of these transfers are cyclical and some are just flukes in the account sheet. Meanwhile, forex reserves have improved mainly because of the increase in remittance inflows and depreciation of Nepali currency against the dollar by approximately 17 percent. During the same period, reserves in Nepali rupee increased by 35.4 percent, but in dollar terms the increase was just by 12.4 percent.

Just by looking at these numbers it defies logic to argue that investment environment has improved and economy is back on track. In fact, quick estimate based on the level of merchandise exports and imports so far this year shows that the total annual figures will hover around Rs 65 billion and Rs 400 billion respectively. Trade deficit will increase more than last year because of massive rise in imports of petroleum products, but it will be countered by rising remittance inflows and transfers, resulting in positive current account.

The very problems that have been plaguing the economy for a decade now are continuing to eat away its strength. There is nothing noteworthy the Maoist-led governments have done to address them after 2006. The average growth rate in the last decade was just 4.1 percent, with agriculture and non-agriculture growth averaging 3.18 percent and 2.34 percent respectively. Imports have reached about 32 percent of GDP and exports are merely 9 percent of GDP. Gross domestic savings are just 7 percent of GDP, signaling the dearth of domestic investment needed to launch big infrastructure projects.

It is still very much a consumption fuelled economy, where increasing domestic production deficit is comfortably filled in by imports, which is financed by remittances. Development budget is heavily dependent on foreign aid and domestic revenue is inadequate to finance even recurrent expenditure. Many farmers in Tarai and Hilly regions are short of adequate fertilizers needed to increase agriculture production, progress in repairing old and completing new irrigation projects has been frustrating, and food insecurity in remote areas remains as problematic as ever due to weak distribution mechanism.

Meantime, domestic industries are gradually perishing. The power woes are stubbornly persistent and the grand plan of reducing load-shedding by importing power from India and by operating diesel plants never fructified. Rationing of electricity and persistent labor problems have forced industries to operate at barely 45 percent capacity. Labor unions have again started to show indifference and irresponsible attitude towards industrial development by shutting down manufacturing plants owned by both domestic and foreign investors (the latest saga being the closure of Unilever Nepal, one of the few remaining MNCs after 1996). Firms are unable to secure enough fuel to run their generators. Restaurants are pulling their shutter down due to shortage of cooking gas.

Following the moderation in prices for a few months, inflation has started to creep up due to rise in prices of petroleum fuel, persistent supply-side constraints, and rise in retail prices of daily consumable goods and services. The threat to private property and forceful land grabbing by Maoist party’s cadres are still there. Safe appropriation of returns to investment is getting increasingly tough. Interest rates are high despite liquidity surplus in the banking sector.

Enthusiastic entrepreneurs are dejected due to the lack of appropriate physical and regulatory infrastructure along with a supportive bureaucracy. In such a situation, one wonders how PM Bhattarai is aiming to entice US$ 1 billion of foreign investment, let alone investment commitment, in six months time when the total FDI in 2010 was barely US $39 million.

The claim of economic revolution by this government is pure hogwash. The economy is stuck in the same mess as it was before. The government has done nothing substantial to put it on the path of high growth, let alone address the short term constraints. The recent good news about bumper agriculture production, improved reserves and BoP surplus has nothing to do with policy changes by this government. Importantly, improvement in these indicators alone does not indicate an improved macroeconomy set to welcome more investment and ready to brace growth rate of over 5 percent.
Published on 2012-02-11 01:15:45
# # Share [Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]



Please give your full name while posting your comments. This is not to stifle the free flow of comments but your full name will enable us to print the comments in our newspaper.


Pure Hogwash
Comment on this news #
Related News
More on Opinion
(Re: Bishal) Okay, good monsoon and good harvest. I won´t argue anything about good monsoon. But definitely I should add what´s needed for good harvest. You need (improved) seeds and fertilizers in the first place. How does a farmer get that? Does he go to India or China to buy by himself? Of course, without government initiative in buying more fertilizers, farmers won´t get that on time. I rather see the increased agricultural output driven by government initiative to bring f [more]
  - Kancha
Very clinical and well argued article. As for as I understand (re:herojig) from the article, I think the government is trying to take credit for the good news. It in fact has nothing to do with this government´s policies. Yes, good monsoon, good harvest, good impact on growth. But, not due to government policies. Oh, I love the rain and decrease in loadshedding hours! :) With regards to (re:Kancha) I think the transitive property doesn´t apply in social science. As I argued earlier [more]
  - Bishal
Thx for the well written article on a topic that I clearly don´t fully understand (being the kuire that I am). So, if I understand you, GoN is claiming good news because it rained. Well, good news of late is as scarce as petro for my motorbike, so I can appreciate a bit of that. Perhaps this is the explanation for power today (while it´s supposed to be off according to the load shedding schedule)? Is the reason for more juice simply "it rained"? Cheers!

  - herojig
Please answer this simple question. I am confused.

No good policies + timely monsoon = increased agricultural output

Good policies + untimely monsoon= ? [more]
  - Kancha
About us  |  Contact us  |  Advertise with us  |  Career   |  Terms of use  |  Privacy policy
Copyright © Nepal Republic Media Pvt. Ltd. 2008-10.